These are my reasons and i've even defended the cunt before. Feel free to post your own.

1. We dont need a big fucking cunt up front, you can rave about Carroll all you want but smashing the ball 40 yards to a target man won't win us fuck all, we need a front 2 of Walcott and Rooney, Darren Bent when either are injured.
2. The midfield don't know how to pass a ball, get in some technical players you fucking prick or ill smash your face in. Stick Gerrard at CM with Wilshere beside him, theres a cunt who could teach Barry a few things about passing a ball.. an 18 year old. Fuck you Bareth Garry. Put Ashley Young and either of the Johnson's on the wings.
3. Put a fucking fullback in the fullback position who can defend. Not a central defender, you ugly spastic. Richards or Onuoha wouldn't be a bad pick.
4. Have some emotion for the team or i'll shove an italian flag up your nostril.
5. This isn't a reason tbh but.. Fuck Off or il put another crater in your forehead.

/rant.

England just don't have the right mentality, they have a good team but I think mentally the players don't give a fuck.

Wow.

It's a freindly. God.
I can't wait to see your reaction when we don't qualify for the Euro's .

Having a target man is the English way. If Capello changed formations you'd hear "fucking foreign managers with their crazy tactics, get an Englishmen in" the dude can't win, should just retire.

---------Hart
Johnson-Jagielka-Terry-Cole
------Cattermole-Wilshere
Johnson----Gerrard-----Young
------------Rooney


Okay.

Why doesn't England have a good ball winning midfielder?

NGreat wrote:It's a freindly. God.
I can't wait to see your reaction when we don't qualify for the Euro's .

How did you know?

No technical ability within the midfield, typical punting of the ball from defence to the midfield. Capello should teach us the old fashioned Italian way atleast

James wrote:---------Hart
Johnson-Jagielka-Terry-Cole
------Cattermole-Wilshere
Johnson----Gerrard-----Young
------------Rooney


Okay.

Why doesn't England have a good ball winning midfielder?

But Cattermole is an asshole, he'll probably get sent off almost every game he plays in.

James wrote:---------Hart
Johnson-Jagielka-Terry-Cole
------Cattermole-Wilshere
Johnson----Gerrard-----Young
------------Rooney


Okay.

Why doesn't England have a good ball winning midfielder?

Cattermole is the type of player England need, but he's the wrong choice. Dude is too reckless. Maybe Rodwell in the future.

Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

We do have a decent ball winning midfielder. It's a shame he's only played five minutes in two years .

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

I disagree, if you look at the team I posted then that does have technical players in. Young and Johnson on the wings both know how to get past a man. Gerrard still knows how to pass and shoot. Wilshere knows how to keep the ball. Johnson and Cole are both great attacking full backs with Cole also being a great defender.

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

Di you watch the game tonight? We really aren't.

NGreat wrote:We do have a decent ball winning midfielder. It's a shame he's only played five minutes in two years .

Well we can't really count him can we?

Crouch, Davies and Carroll shouldn't be in the team, Crouch has a good goal record but he's still shit imo, and he's just a tall cunt that everyone wants to smash the ball up to him, I don't like that at all.

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

I disagree, if you look at the team I posted then that does have technical players in. Young and Johnson on the wings both know how to get past a man. Gerrard still knows how to pass and shoot. Wilshere knows how to keep the ball. Johnson and Cole are both great attacking full backs with Cole also being a great defender.

I wouldn't consider those players technical. Then again, I'm spoiled being Italian and Spaniard.

ILCaesar wrote:

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

I disagree, if you look at the team I posted then that does have technical players in. Young and Johnson on the wings both know how to get past a man. Gerrard still knows how to pass and shoot. Wilshere knows how to keep the ball. Johnson and Cole are both great attacking full backs with Cole also being a great defender.

I wouldn't consider those players technical. Then again, I'm spoiled being Italian and Spaniard.

So tell me what you class as a technical player.

Crouch has a good record. Means nothing. He has no technique what so ever and encourages the team to hoof the ball to him. Gibbs' postioning is shocking. I'll have anyone at the back who doesn't smash it upfield or back to the keeper at every oportunity. Foster is poor.

JMB_94 wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

Di you watch the game tonight? We really aren't.

Why would I watch England?

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

I disagree, if you look at the team I posted then that does have technical players in. Young and Johnson on the wings both know how to get past a man. Gerrard still knows how to pass and shoot. Wilshere knows how to keep the ball. Johnson and Cole are both great attacking full backs with Cole also being a great defender.

I wouldn't consider those players technical. Then again, I'm spoiled being Italian and Spaniard.

So tell me what you class as a technical player.

You saw one tonight. Nasri.

The-Reporter wrote:

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

I disagree, if you look at the team I posted then that does have technical players in. Young and Johnson on the wings both know how to get past a man. Gerrard still knows how to pass and shoot. Wilshere knows how to keep the ball. Johnson and Cole are both great attacking full backs with Cole also being a great defender.

I wouldn't consider those players technical. Then again, I'm spoiled being Italian and Spaniard.

So tell me what you class as a technical player.

You saw one tonight. Nasri.

Didn't ask for names. I want him to tell me what he means by a technical player because to say England don't have any isn't fair.

Foster did alright

Gerrard and Barry were poor again tbh, Carroll didn't get a sniff at all. Another quite average performance.

I didn't say England didn't have any. I just said they are few and far between, especially if you compare them to nations like Italy, Spain, and France.

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

I disagree, if you look at the team I posted then that does have technical players in. Young and Johnson on the wings both know how to get past a man. Gerrard still knows how to pass and shoot. Wilshere knows how to keep the ball. Johnson and Cole are both great attacking full backs with Cole also being a great defender.

I wouldn't consider those players technical. Then again, I'm spoiled being Italian and Spaniard.

So tell me what you class as a technical player.

They are technical, every player in the word has some technique, or else every touch would go 6 yards. But the technique of English players doesn't match up with their foreign counterparts, when it comes to close control, ball skill, vision, and all that crap, most English players have a long line of players ahead of them when it comes to that position, except Cole really.


And before people bust me being American, Americans technique ain't great either.

Danny B wrote:Foster did alright

Gerrard and Barry were poor again tbh, Carroll didn't get a sniff at all. Another quite average performance.

No he didnt and I'm not just going by the goals he conceded.

Jord wrote:

Danny B wrote:Foster did alright

Gerrard and Barry were poor again tbh, Carroll didn't get a sniff at all. Another quite average performance.

No he didnt and I'm not just going by the goals he conceded.

Made a good save from Gourcuff and recovered after he almost fumbled Malouda's shot. Could do nothing about Valbeuna's tbh

dena wrote:

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:

James wrote:

ILCaesar wrote:Technical English players are few and far between. Why not do your whole long ball thing? Thought you guys were good at that.

I disagree, if you look at the team I posted then that does have technical players in. Young and Johnson on the wings both know how to get past a man. Gerrard still knows how to pass and shoot. Wilshere knows how to keep the ball. Johnson and Cole are both great attacking full backs with Cole also being a great defender.

I wouldn't consider those players technical. Then again, I'm spoiled being Italian and Spaniard.

So tell me what you class as a technical player.

They are technical, every player in the word has some technique, or else every touch would go 6 yards. But the technique of English players doesn't match up with their foreign counterparts, when it comes to close control, ball skill, vision, and all that crap, most English players have a long line of players ahead of them when it comes to that position, except Cole really.


And before people bust me being American, Americans technique ain't great either.

I think we do have technical players.

The main problem with England is the players aren't being allowed to play how they do for their clubs. Whereas Spain for example, each player pretty much plays the exact same way for club and country.

Danny B wrote:Foster did alright

Gerrard and Barry were poor again tbh, Carroll didn't get a sniff at all. Another quite average performance.

Foster is shit, he had to do three things and done one which was an easy save from distance, he should have saved the first goal definitely.